Special Meeting

No content available.

[671] Phuong Nguyen: Good evening and welcome to the March 9th Newark Unified School District Board of Education special meeting. We are holding in-person board meetings at our district boardroom and are following the state's and Alameda County safety guidelines for public gathering. Please refrain from attending in-person meetings if you have COVID related symptoms. If you're not able to attend the meetings in person, you may observe the meeting via the NUSD YouTube channel, live transmission on Comcast channel 26, and there is Spanish translation available via Zoom. Public comments. The public will have the opportunity to address the board regarding non-agendized matters and agendized items with a live with a speaker card back in the back of the room. You can fill that out. And also, via Zoom, please email your comments to publiccomments at newarkunified.org. And you can also send a public comment to publiccomments at newarkunified.org. I know I repeated that. Sorry. OK, on to Pledge of Allegiance.

[750] Aiden Hill: Please rise.

[756] Phuong Nguyen: Yeah, and then roll call. I pledge allegiance to the flag of the United States of America, and to the republic for which it stands, one nation under God, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all. And roll call, please, Ms. Gutierrez.

[781] SPEAKER_26: Student member, Resendee Sarchese. Here. Board member, Zhang.

[787] Terrence Grindall: Here.

[788] SPEAKER_26: Board member, Hill.

[789] Terrence Grindall: Here.

[789] SPEAKER_26: Vice president, Grendel.

[790] Terrence Grindall: Here.

[791] SPEAKER_26: President Nguyen. Here. And member Marquez is trying to remotely log in. So maybe if she shows up later, I'll let you know. OK, thank you. Currently absent.

[801] Phuong Nguyen: Thank you. Okay, on to approval of the agenda. May I have a motion to approve the agenda, please?

[808] Bowen Zhang: I move to approve the agenda as it is. I second.

[814] Phuong Nguyen: Motion made by Member Zhang, seconded by Member Grindell. How do you vote, student board member?

[819] SPEAKER_27: Yes.

[820] Phuong Nguyen: Member Zhang? Yes. Member Hill? Yes. Member Grindell? Yes. I myself, yes as well. So we have five yes. And one absent.

[834] SPEAKER_26: And president. Oh, yes. President Nguyen, member Marquez is online.

[841] Phuong Nguyen: OK, great. Hello, member Marquez. Hi, good evening. Good evening. OK, in closed session, are there any public comments on closed session? I want to ask her vote. Oh. On the agenda. Was she? OK. Member Marquez, how would you like to vote on the approval of the agenda?

[862] SPEAKER_18: Yes.

[863] Phuong Nguyen: OK, so we have six ayes. In closed session, are there any public comments? So in closed session, we will be discussing 3.2, public employee discipline dismissal release, 3.3, conference with labor negotiators, 3.4, conference with I'm sorry, 3.3, conference with labor negotiators, NTA and CSCA. 3.4, conference with labor negotiators, NEWMA. And 3.5, conference with legal counsel, anticipated litigation. We will recess to closed session. Thank you. Welcome back. We're back from closed session. And we do have one item to report out on item 3.2, public employee discipline dismissal release. The board took action on a vote of 4 to 1 to non-reelect a certain certificated employee, employee ID number 4281, effective at the end of the 21-22 school year. The superintendent of designee is directed to provide the required notice to the employee per Ed Code 44929.21B. With member Zhang voting yes, member Marquez voting yes, with member Grindel voting yes, and member Nguyen voting yes, and with member Hill voting no. Thank you. On to item 5.1, new business. Resolution number 21.22.32, Classified Layoffs, Superintendent Triplett.

[3523] Mark Triplett: There we go. I pressed the wrong button. So this is the resolution with regard to classified layoffs. And I'm going to turn it over to Ms. Ingham-Watters to explain a little bit about this.

[3538] SPEAKER_20: Good evening. The resolution for your approval tonight is for classified staff due to lack of work or lack of funds. As you may know, the timeline for the classified layoff process has been changed from a 60 day notice to now mirroring our timeline for certificated layoffs, which is a notification by March 15th. Included in this resolution are three types of things, which I'd like to provide some context for each of them. The first one is a layoff of classified child care positions, including lead one attendance, lead two attendance, attendance, child care office secretary, and child care office technician. The second to note is a layoff of a fractional position for a library clerk. And the third is reductions in positions for three employees who had an increase for 21-22 only. So those are the three types of items included in the resolution. I would like to provide more context for each of these. In reviewing the revenue, the first one is childcare. In renewing the revenue and deficit trends as well as enrollment declines in our childcare department, we have not yet been able to determine the student enrollment, the staffing needs, or structures for what child care could look like for 22-23 school year. To be clear, this is not a resolution to close the child care program. There is a need to gather more information now and through the spring. However, Due to this newer AB 438 timeline of March 15th, it is in the best interest of the district financially to provide notice to the classified child care employees. Once the information is gathered and analyzed, we will take action to staff it appropriately for 22-23. I would like the board to know that we have reached out to every child care employee before today and communicated this information and context around it. The second one also included in that table at the top for layoffs is the library clerk at Lincoln Elementary. There is a 0.11250 position. for the library clerk at Lincoln. This is in addition to the regular library clerk position of 0.48750 FTE that the sites have as their base FTE. This smaller position, the 0.11250, has been previously funded yearly by the Parent Teacher Club. It is the intent for this to continue happening. However, due to our AB 438 timeline, we will need to provide a layoff notice for this 0.11250 FTE as we are unable to verify in early March if the funding will in fact continue for this. Once that is verified, The parent club will be invoiced and the position can continue for 22-23. However, it is to note that an item like this would be on a yearly basis part of a resolution like this, since it is not a guaranteed funding source. The principal has reached out to the library clerk and provided information around the need and context for this layoff. Finally, on the resolution, there's a smaller box on the bottom, and these are the reductions in positions. There are three positions that were increased for the 21-22 school year. The total FTE reduction will be 0.50375 FTE. Birchgrove Primary increased the office clerks' FTE using one-time COVID funding for 21-22 only. The two Newark Memorial High School food service assistants, FTE, two of them were increased up to a 1.0 FTE to meet the need for the volume of service needed at the high school. For 22-23, these three positions will revert back to the FTE that they previously had. Since these are reductions, we have already negotiated and come to an agreement around these with our CSCA negotiations team. We will continue to work with our CSCA leadership to bargain the effects and impacts for these reductions, as well as the previous resolution regarding layoffs.

[3873] Phuong Nguyen: Thank you, Ms. Singham-Waters. Any questions or comments by members of the board? Member Zhang? Member Hill?

[3884] Aiden Hill: So fellow board members, I'm very troubled regarding our district's current trajectory. And today's special meeting is only the latest example of actions being taken that are non-transparent, manipulative, and undemocratic. Please allow me to share my concerns. The stated purpose of this special meeting is to lay off approximately eight child care related FTE due to lack of funds. When I emailed Dr. Triplett asking why this topic had not been covered in the last meeting on March 3rd, he wrote, as I stated in my previous email, there are staffing items that require a special session of the board prior to March 15th. These items could not be addressed in the prior board meeting since they had not been agendized. My question is, if this is an area of concern, why wasn't it agendized? This is not a new issue. Please allow me to refresh your memories. During the pandemic, our child care program, which is primarily funded from fees charged to parents, suffered a loss of funds due to the shutdown. Yet staff apparently decided not to inform the board that we would continue to retain these personnel and not explore some kind of temporary ramp down to save on cost. Consequently, it was disclosed in the September 2nd, 2021 board meeting that this had occurred and there was a deficit, but per Miss Delacruz, there was nothing to worry about because the child care program under normal operating conditions generates a surplus, which would then be used to pay back the deficit. At this point, there was no discussion of closing child care services. During the December 6, 2021 board meeting involving discussion of the first interim budget, there was mention that child care was continuing to run a deficit, contrary to guidance given in September. But there was no discussion at that point about the need to cancel the program. The only cost savings measures identified at that point involved possible district-wide freezing of cost of living adjustments. And when a special meeting was called on February 23rd to push through a new three-year contract for MistelaCruz, which in many respects offers more favorable terms than for CBOs in higher performing surrounding districts such as Palo Alto, there was no discussion of giving the community only 24 hours to weigh in on this decision, nor any mention made of whether offering an annual 2% per year COLA to executive staff might not be equitable in a time when we are talking about freezing COLAs, cost of living adjustments, for most other district personnel. In the recent second interim budget report delivered less than a week ago on March 3rd, we learned more about the structural deficits we are facing and were asked to make decisions regarding personnel cuts in excess of 60 FTE to cover these projected deficits. But again, no mention was made regarding cutting childcare. Yet less than 24 hours after that meeting, the board was informed that we needed to call another special meeting to address additional staffing issues. Despite this meeting being called in advance, however, no details were provided to the board or the public until roughly 24 hours before this evening's meeting. And even then, the details were sparse. Furthermore, in this meeting, we aren't being asked to review the childcare situation. We aren't being given options to weigh and consider. And given this short notice, we aren't providing the community who we represent an opportunity to review the situation and provide input, despite the fact that shutting down child care could have an adverse effect on the biggest driver of our structural deficit, namely declining enrollment. No, just as with the CBO's contract, we in the community are being asked by Dr. Triplett to be a rubber stamp. This pattern of calling special meetings now seems intentional. Staff wants to report out any bad, potentially bad, controversial, or negative news based on the short notice requirements of a special meeting, giving the board and the public less than 24 hours to research and consider important decisions. And in these latest meetings, we are being asked to feather the nests of top executives while implementing potentially devastating cuts to services and stakeholders because of ongoing executive mismanagement. Dr. Triplett is constantly talking about equity but I don't see how any of this behavior falls under this category. High-quality decisions are made with high-quality information and sufficient time for proper deliberation and consideration. As we say in project management, your poor planning is not my emergency. Therefore, given the short notice, lack of information, and lack of community input, I in good conscience cannot vote to approve staff's current recommendation. And based on recent events, I'm also requesting that President Nguyen tell Dr. Triplett that we must stop the abuse of the special meeting process. It doesn't afford board members time to make high-quality informed decisions, and it undermines the public's constitutional right to give guidance to those who represent them. Thank you for your consideration on this topic.

[4204] Phuong Nguyen: Member Grindel.

[4207] Terrence Grindall: Yes. I want to understand better. I understood from the staff report that this is a notification of potential layoff. It is not It is not taking any action to shut, despite what Member Hill was indicating, this is not an action to shut down or change our child care situation, simply to provide the adequate notice legally and so that staff can have the flexibility to make adjustments if necessary and that you'll be bringing that back to us. Is that an accurate assessment?

[4244] Mark Triplett: Thank you member Grindell that is correct and it's something that has been communicated. It was mentioned by missing the waters in her statement and it's also been communicated to board members prior including member Hill.

[4263] Terrence Grindall: Yeah, I want to clarify I want to clarify that point. Thank you.

[4270] Phuong Nguyen: Yes, student board member.

[4273] SPEAKER_27: While I do know I cannot vote on this matter, I would like to also express my concern echoing Member Hill's comment at the fact that this is a very serious topic that we are discussing and the fact that it is a special board meeting and we have no community present nor any public comment. We can't, but the fact that there is no community present, the fact that it was only 24 hours and even then there was no discussion of it, seems very strange, and I would love to hear community input, especially when we're taking out food service assistance, when the lines at lunch at North Memorial High are immensely long, and it's almost impossible to get food at a timely matter, eat it, and then head straight to class. That's one of the small issues. I don't know what the other schools are going through. And it's very strange that this is the third layoff that we're talking about, when, like Mr. Hill mentioned, we also gave a CBO raise. All of this does not seem to add up to me. Thank you. Member Nadeau.

[4334] Terrence Grindall: I just wanted to again clarify, we're not actually taking these actions at this point. We're providing notice, legally required notice, so that if it's necessary, we can make changes. There's no change actually being proposed at this point. I want to clarify that again.

[4354] Ray Rodriguez: That's correct.

[4356] Phuong Nguyen: Yes, and in terms of, I just want to answer, calling special meetings, it is at our discretion to be able to do so. And in this case, we did this so that we are trying to be transparent. We're not making decisions in closed session regarding items. And it is not in any way violating Brown Act or anything like that. We are in every due diligence able to do to make requests for special meetings in terms of like what staff is able to do or was not able to put on agenda items. And in this case, they have a March 15th deadline to notice these employees. And while they do that, they will be able to they'll be able to reevaluate the situation in terms of like when child care enrollment is up or make those determinations. And if they have to notice individuals and we have to take action on the F, then that will happen. But right now, it's because of the mandate, the early the early notification of March 15. They have to do that. Thank you. Yes, Mariel.

[4444] Aiden Hill: Yes, thank you. Again, I think that the focus should be that we should be doing business during regular board meetings, and that we should be giving ample notice.

[4460] Phuong Nguyen: I don't disagree with you, but there are circumstances where we cannot.

[4464] Aiden Hill: So ma'am, if you could let me finish. And I don't understand how we all of a sudden learned about this issue. less than 24 hours after our last board meeting. And even when we were informed of this, which was last Friday, there was no information that was sent to the board members prior to yesterday afternoon, and that information was very sparse. So we cannot be making high quality decisions when meetings are called at the last minute and there's very little information that's provided in advance and no opportunity for the public to comment on that.

[4511] Terrence Grindall: Dr. Krupa, could you address those concerns?

[4514] Mark Triplett: Certainly. Just to be clear, the statement that there was no communication to board until less than 24 hours is just summarily incorrect. And there was the statement that there was no information about the topics of this board meeting until less than 24 hours is Just completely inaccurate. It's false.

[4535] Aiden Hill: So Okay, so again We had a board meeting last Thursday with the left within less than 24 hours We were then having this meeting a call for this meeting We were provided a couple of sentences that said that there was a staffing issue that was needed to be addressed, but no additional information. The only additional information we received was when the board agenda item was published yesterday at approximately 2 o'clock. And again, it didn't have the voiceover that Ms. Ingham-Watters provided. And so we had very limited information about exactly what this was and to be able to properly prepare and to be able to deliberate and make decisions on this.

[4585] SPEAKER_26: I'm sorry, President Nguyen, I apologize. Member Marquez has a comment.

[4589] Phuong Nguyen: Yes, Member Marquez.

[4592] SPEAKER_18: Thank you for the acknowledgement. I just wanted to make a statement with regards to the factors. We need to understand that we as a district oftentimes are faced with factors that we can control and then unfortunately there are those that that are beyond our control, which at this time, it's obvious that it's not that it's forcing our hand, but it's putting the district in a situation where we have to abide by the laws and by the new March 15th deadline that we are mirroring with the other association. Unfortunately, the layoff date itself isn't actually in sync when it comes to our state legislation as well as the budget cycle. So right now we're going through what's called quite a bit of unknowns. including the fact that we have our Governor Newsom and then the lawmakers that are trying to negotiate. We won't hear that until June. And then on top of that, knowing how many kids are actually going to show up in school come this August as far as registration. So I can appreciate the fact that as a school district registration started earlier this year and that we really as a school district approached trying to get a better number of the families that are going to be joining us in the fall, that there are many unknowns. So as a school district, by issuing and following the laws which have been set for March 15th, again, I have to reiterate, they do not fall necessarily in line with what our governor and lawmakers are setting up for us, but we need to stay in and to protect ourself and stay on top of those dates. So I feel the decision and the information that we're receiving is proactive. It's not only to protect the school distributor as well as the employees so that they aren't dealing with something at the last minute so that they're, oh, by the way, no, we are being proactive. Information is being provided. It was well explained. And so these are just some of those factors that unfortunately we're not able to control based off of the budgeting cycle. So I appreciate the fact that we did bring this as a meeting because we need to make sure that we stay within the guidelines of the March 15th deadline. Thank you.

[4726] Phuong Nguyen: Thank you, Member Marquez. Thank you. We have exhausted our opportunity to speak. So thank you, members. And do I have a motion?

[4734] Bowen Zhang: I move that we approve the resolution.

[4737] Phuong Nguyen: I second. Motion made by Member Zhang, seconded by myself. How do you vote, Member Zhang? Yes. Member Marquez? Yes. Member Hill?

[4747] Diego Torres: No.

[4748] Phuong Nguyen: Member Grindell? Yes. I myself is a yes. We have four ayes and one no. Thank you. Thank you, staff. I know that this is a hard decision. You know having to make but being proactive and you know, we are trying to be fiscally responsible for next year and Making sure that child care is funded appropriately. Thank you On to item 6.1 personnel report I move that we ratify the personnel report as presented I'll second How do you vote, member Zhang?

[4797] Bowen Zhang: Question, just go ask. Ask a question, then we'll vote.

[4800] Aiden Hill: OK, so it's for missing of waters. So I noticed that there were a number of resignations on the Powell. And I wanted to just get a sense of, does that number look appropriate for this time? Or is it, I mean, when I say appropriate,

[4825] Aiden Hill: And then question two is, it's always helpful to do exit interviews to understand why people are leaving. And so I wanted to find out if we are doing exit interviews.

[4837] SPEAKER_20: I would have to go back and look at the previous PAL reports around this time of year. I didn't come prepared with that. And as you know, this is my first season in this new role. So I'm not sure I can answer that question to that detail. The second question about exit interviews, yes, you'll notice that the effective date of these resignations are at the end of the school year. And so there is a process to exit an employee. And so they will be invited to come to HR and go through paperwork and talk to us.

[4876] Mark Triplett: And if I'm not correct, I believe all of these individuals have been met with recently by HR or by the supervisor. Is that correct?

[4887] Nicole Izant: That's correct.

[4894] SPEAKER_26: Currently, we do have a motion on the table with a motion made by Member Zhang and second by Member Nguyen.

[4901] Phuong Nguyen: Thank you, Ms. Gutierrez. How do you vote, Member Zhang? Member Marquez?

[4906] Marie dela Cruz: Yes.

[4907] Phuong Nguyen: Member Hill? Yes. Member Grindell? Yes. And myself as yes. Five ayes. Thank you. And last adjournment. May I get a motion for adjournment?

[4923] Bowen Zhang: I move to adjourn.

[4924] Terrence Grindall: I'll second.

[4927] Phuong Nguyen: Motion made by Member Zhang, seconded by Member Grindell. How do you vote, student board member? Yes. Member Zhang?

[4934] Bowen Zhang: Yes.

[4935] Phuong Nguyen: Member Marquez? Yes. Member Hill. Yes. Member Grindel.

[4941] Terrence Grindall: Yes.

[4942] Phuong Nguyen: And myself is yes. Six ayes. Thank you. Meeting adjourned at 7.14 p.m.

1. CALL TO ORDER

Meeting Practices and Information

Type Information, Procedural IN-PERSON MEETING INFORMATION NUSD has opened its boardroom for in-person meetings and will follow the State's and Alameda County's safety guidelines for public gatherings. Please refrain from attending in-person meetings if you have any of the following symptoms: Loss of taste/smell Difficulty breathing Vomiting Diarrhea Fever Cough Headache Sore Throat Runny Nose

For additional COVID-19 information please go to https://www.newarkunified.org/covid-19 or https://www.acoe.org/guidance

OBSERVE THE BOARD OF EDUCATION MEETING Members of the public may observe the meeting via the NUSD YouTube Channel, live transmission on Comcast Channel 26, or in- person at the NUSD Boardroom. Spanish translation will be available via Zoom.

PUBLIC COMMENT

The public will have the opportunity to address the Board of Education regarding non-agendized matters and agendized items with a live audio-only comment via Zoom with advance notice requested by email at PUBLICCOMMENT@newarkunified.org, a written comment by submitting a speaking card via email at PUBLICCOMMENT@newarkunified.org, or with live in-person comments by submitting a speaker-card with the Executive Assistant.

Pledge of Allegiance

Type Procedural PURPOSE: The Governance Team will recite the Pledge of Allegiance

Roll Call

Type Procedural TRUSTEES:

President Phuong Nguyen Vice President/Clerk Terrence Grindall Member Aiden Hill Member Alicia Marquez Member Bowen Zhang

STUDENT BOARD MEMBER:

Member Estaina Resendiz Ortiz

2. APPROVAL OF AGENDA

Approval of the Agenda

Type Action

Recommended It is recommended that the Board of Education approve the agenda for this meeting. Action PURPOSE: Members of the Governance Team may request that the agenda be amended or approved as presented.

Motion & Voting It is recommended that the Board of Education approve the agenda for this meeting.

Motion by Bowen Zhang, second by Terrence Grindall.
Final Resolution: Motion Carries
Yea: Phuong Nguyen, Terrence Grindall, Aiden Hill, Alicia Marquez, Bowen Zhang, Estaina Resendiz-Ortiz

3. CLOSED SESSION

Public Comment on Closed Session Items

Type Information PURPOSE: The Board of Education encourages the community's participation in its deliberations and has tried to make it convenient to express their views to the Board. If a constituent wishes to address the Board on any agenda item, please fill out a virtual speaker card via email at PUBLICCOMMENT@newarkunified.org.

PUBLIC EMPLOYEE DISCIPLINE/DISMISSAL/RELEASE (Gov. Code, � 54957, subd. (b)(1))

Type Action, Information, Procedural PURPOSE: Information will be provided by the Superintendent and Executive Director of Human Resources.

CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATORS (Gov. Code, � 54957.6, subd. (a): Employee Organizations - NTA and CSEA

Type Action, Information, Procedural PURPOSE: Information may be provided by the agency negotiator, Executive Director of Human Resources. Assistance from the legal firm Dannis, Woliver, Kelley, Attorneys at Law may be provided.

The employee organizations include NTA & CSEA.

CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATORS (Gov. Code, � 54957.6, subd. (a)): Employee Group - NEWMA, Unrepresented Supervisors, and Contracted Management

Type Action, Information, Procedural PURPOSE: Information may be provided by the agency negotiator, the Executive Director of Human Resources, and the Superintendent. Assistance from legal firm Dannis, Woliver, Kelley, Attorneys at Law may be provided.

The employee organizations include NEWMA, Unrepresented Supervisors, and Contracted Management

CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL � ANTICIPATED LITIGATION Significant exposure to litigation pursuant to Gov. Code, � 54956.9, subd. (d)[(2) or (3)]

Type Action, Information, Procedural PURPOSE: Information may be provided regarding significant exposure to litigation pursuant to paragraph (2) of subdivision (d) of Section 54956.9: One case

Recess to Closed Session

Type Procedural PURPOSE: The Board will recess to Closed Session, and reconvene to Open Session on or about 7:00 p.m.

4. REPORT OF CLOSED SESSION ACTIONS

Report of Closed Session Actions

Type Action, Procedural PURPOSE: If available, a report of the closed session will be provided by the Board President.

5. NEW BUSINESS

Resolution No. 21.22.32 Classified Layoffs

Type Action

Absolute Date Mar 09, 2022

Recommended The recommendation is that the Board of Education approve Resolution No. 2021.22.32 to lay Action off or reduce hours of certain classified positions for lack of work or lack of funds. PURPOSE:

Resolution No. 2021.22.32 will be presented to the Board of Education for approval to lay off certain classified positions for lack of work or lack of funds. This resolution gives authorization for the District to formally notify certain classified employees that they are being laid off. This process is required under California Education Code 45117, which requires permanent employees to be notified by March 15, 2022.

BACKGROUND:

Due to unknown enrollment for the district's childcare programs for the 2022-2023 school year, and the new requirement to provide notice to classified staff by March 15, the district is recommending layoff notices be provided for all classified Lead 1, Lead 2, and assistant positions.

The district reviewed the layoff positions with CSEA. Employees affected by layoff will have 39-month re-employment rights and the process will be governed by the collective bargaining agreement.

File Attachments California Education Code 45117.pdf (277 KB) Classified Layoff Resolution 03.09.2022.pdf (108 KB)

Motion & Voting The recommendation is that the Board of Education approve Resolution No. 2021.22.32 to lay off or reduce hours of certain classified positions for lack of work or lack of funds.

Motion by Bowen Zhang, second by Phuong Nguyen.
Yea: Phuong Nguyen, Terrence Grindall, Bowen Zhang
Nay: Aiden Hill
Abstain: Estaina Resendiz-Ortiz
Not Present at Vote: Alicia Marquez

6. CONSENT AGENDA: PERSONNEL ITEMS

Personnel Report

Type Action

Absolute Date Mar 09, 2022

Recommended The recommendation is that the Board of Education ratify the personnel report as presented. Action All personnel activities including new hires, changes in status, resignation, leaves, and retirements are routinely submitted to the Board for ratification.

File Attachments HR PAL 03-09-2022 Special Board Meeting.pdf (376 KB)

Motion & Voting The recommendation is that the Board of Education ratify the personnel report as presented.

Motion by Bowen Zhang, second by Phuong Nguyen.
Final Resolution: Motion Carries
Yea: Phuong Nguyen, Terrence Grindall, Aiden Hill, Alicia Marquez, Bowen Zhang
Abstain: Estaina Resendiz-Ortiz

7. ADJOURNMENT

PLACEHOLDER - Extend Meeting

Type Action

Recommended The recommendation is that the Board of Education extends the meeting to ____P.M. Action PURPOSE: This is a placeholder, only to be used if the Board adds a motion and action to extend the meeting.

Adjournment

Type Action, Procedural

Recommended The recommendation is that the Board of Education adjourns this meeting. Action PURPOSE: No items will be considered after 10:00 p.m. unless it is determined by a majority of the Board to extend to a specific time.

This action will conclude the meeting.

Motion & Voting The recommendation is that the Board of Education adjourns this meeting at 7:14pm.

Motion by Bowen Zhang, second by Terrence Grindall.
Final Resolution: Motion Carries
Yea: Phuong Nguyen, Terrence Grindall, Aiden Hill, Alicia Marquez, Bowen Zhang, Estaina Resendiz-Ortiz

No minutes available.